K.T. Hammond’s criticism follows Bagbin’s claims on Wednesday, accusing both the President and the Judiciary of colluding to undermine the authority of Parliament.

This statement came after Speaker Bagbin controversially declared four parliamentary seats vacant, a decision later stayed by the Supreme Court.

These developments have intensified tensions, with the New Patriotic Party (NPP) accusing the Speaker of deepening political divisions in the country.

They argue that instead of respecting the Supreme Court’s ruling, Bagbin should have directed the National Democratic Congress (NDC) MPs to occupy their designated seats in the Chamber.

However, speaking on Asempa FM’s Ekosii Sen show, K.T. Hammond disagreed with the Speaker’s actions.

“You were wrong, and everything you’re doing is not right. Learn to respect the authority of the Constitution,” he said.

To Mr Hammond, Speaker Bagbin’s actions will only impact the country’s political environment negatively.

“You owe it to the good people of Ghana to do the right thing. Don’t attack the Supreme Court,” he added.

The Trade and Industry Minister went on to say that Bagbin was “completely out of place and wrong,” and advised him to stop speaking on the matter and allow his lawyers to handle it.

“The standing orders are bogus. You have to respect the authority of the Constitution and the Supreme Court.”

Hammond warned that the public is suffering as a result of these ongoing disputes.

“In the end, it’s the good people of Ghana who lose. We are halting a lot of important business that needs to be done in the House,” he stated.

He also accused Bagbin and the Speaker’s party allies of pursuing an agenda that is disrupting Parliament’s work.

ALSO READ:

• When John Jinapor stormed Parliament on a motorbike [Video]
• We won’t fight anyone in Parliament today – NPP MPs
• K.T. Hammond flares up after Speaker adjourns Parliament again [Video]

But for Kobina Tahir Hammond (KT), that notion and perception of Dr Prempeh is wrong.

To him, Dr Prempeh was a “confident person” who pairs perfectly with Dr Mahamudu Bawumia as flag bearer and running mate of the NPP.

In a media interview in Kumasi on Tuesday, ahead of the official outdooring of Dr Prempeh as running mate, K.T. Hammond jumped to his defence and said people often mistook “confidence” as “arrogance”.

“That’s absolute nonsense. When they can’t compete with you, they come up with all sorts of crap. I don’t understand this business of arrogance. Some people take confidence for arrogance,” K.T. Hammond said in the interview with Joy News.

“The man may be confident, may be knowing what he’s doing. I mean you don’t translate that into arrogance. I have heard one or two people talk about arrogance, but I think that is complete nonsense,” KT Hammond added.

When queried on Dr Prempeh’s track record in the education and energy sectors, K.T. Hammond who is the Member of Parliament (MP) for Adansi-Asokwa in the Ashanti Region maintained that Dr Prempeh like any other human being was not perfect but managed to handle whatever duties he was given to the best of his abilities.

“We don’t have 100 per cent perfect human being. No human can make claim to infallibility. So he may have had one or two difficulties here and there but he is solid and going to pair properly, effectively, comprehensively with our candidate,” he said.

He stressed that the Bawumia/Napo ticket was not only going to “Break the 8” but also relegate the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC) into “oblivion”.

In an interview with Evans Mensah on Joy News’ PM Express, the Minister shared that he had heard rumours about CMAG members mocking his efforts.

“I heard through the grapevine that they were teasing me, saying, ‘The Minister can’t do it. Nobody can resolve this matter of cement pricing,’” he recounted.

In response, Minister Hammond summoned two CMAG members to his office, questioning them, “Why do you think the Minister is powerless to control cement prices?” The members denied making such comments.

However, the Minister continued to receive feedback indicating scepticism about his ability to regulate prices.

He acknowledged the challenges posed by a free market system, stating, “I understand it is a free economy, so everyone does what they want.”

He emphasized that a free economy should not equate to exploiting consumers.

“My understanding of a free economy is not the freedom to cheat or fleece people. Economic enterprise is about the freedom of trade and achieving profits within reasonable means, not making senseless and unreasonable profits at the expense of the citizenry,” he said.

MORE: 

• Bawumia presents NAPO as choice of running mate to Akufo-Addo
• Dumsor: Krachi West Hospital threatens to close down mortuary, other units
• Man allegedly buries son secretly after beating him to death 

The legislator insists that ‘Alhaji’ should be officially included in his name within parliamentary records.

Speaking in Parliament, he quizzed that “I am the new Alhaji in Parliament why has that not been announced and recorded.”

The Islamic holy rites of Hajj have just concluded, resulting in a new batch of Alhaji’s and Hajia’s, including the MP for Adansi Asokwa and Minister for Trade and Industry, K.T. Hammond.

The MP criticized his parliamentary whip for failing to announce his new title before his return from Saudi Arabia.

“I’m told that the bill preceded my attendance in Parliament and that it was announced. Is that true? Has it not been announced? Mr. Speaker, has it not been announced that there are new Alhaji’s in this chamber? I want it recorded and recorded properly that we have new Alhaji’s.”

He has also directed the Clerk to Parliament to ensure that his title as Alhaji is reflected in official parliamentary documents.

“Mr Speaker that’s the information for the house the record will accordingly or should reflect the new names, you should make sure that it is properly reflected,” he added.

ALSO READ:

Finance Minister’s figures don’t tally If you check very well –..

End of Debt restructuring brings some certainty into financial market –..

In an interview, the lawmaker says his motivation was to go back to Parliament to help fill the vacuum created by the decision of many experienced MPs from the NPP side not to return to the House.

The Minister of Trade and Industry first entered Parliament in 2001 and is currently serving his 6th term in the farming constituency.

He is facing competition from three other aspirants who have already filed their nominations in the Adansi-Asokwa constituency including Sammy Binfo Darkwa, Kwabena Asamoah and Dr. Boakye Acheampong.

K.T. Hammond told the media in Adansi-Asokwa that he was responding to calls from his constituents to seek another term judging by his good works.

Following the announcement by Joseph Osei Owusu, MP for Bekwai, Dan Botwe, MP for Okere, Samuel Atta Akyea, MP for Abuakwa South and Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu, MP for Suame that they will not be returning to Parliament, Mr K.T. Hammond said their decision will create a vacuum in Parliament and affect the quality of work in the House.

He therefore urged the youth to desist from contesting for the space of experienced Parliamentarians.

“The future of this country is for the youth. There’s no argument about that, I have always been saying that a government is a mixture of the youth and the experienced ones but it doesn’t mean the youth should scramble for our space when we still have life in us. If we allow this to continue and all the big boys decide to leave then we will have a very big issue at hand” Mr. Hammond warned.

Goverment will achieve its polices and programs – Ashanti Regional Minister

Oranto Petroleum Extends Oil Exploration License in Uganda for Two Years

NDC mourns Apostle Ntumy

In his interview with Citi FM, Mr. Hammond also used the opportunity to explain how his “behind-the-scenes-involvement” somewhat caused colleague New Patriotic Party top members to wrongly accuse him of “being in bed with the Mahama government”.

“I went to the Flagstaff House to see President John Mahama on this matter that has now become the success that the whole country is celebrating today,” Mr. Hammond said.

He added, “I have followed this matter from my days when I was at the Ministry of Energy to when I was in opposition as Ranking Member and thereafter and I can confidently say that the outcome has been worth the pursuit”.

On Saturday, ITLOS resolved in Hamburg, Germany, the three-year-long dispute between the two West African neighbors over the Cape Three Points oil and gas fields [and the surrounding fields] in favor of Ghana at the Tribunal’s final sitting on the matter, brought by Ghana.

The judgment came as huge relief to both the government of Ghana and the major oil and gas companies whose investments in the disputed territory were, prior to Saturday’s decision, precariously at stake.

For instance, in April 2015, ITLOS ordered a number of provisional measures which forced Ghana to suspend the drilling of new oil and gas wells in the disputed territory, pending the outcome of the litigation.

That decision caused Ghana’s TEN field to begin production with 11 of the planned 24 wells, as no new wells could be drilled until the dispute was settled.

Again, Ghana’s public purse – which has so far raked in over 3 billion dollars since the country began commercial oil production in 2009 – would have taken a devastating hit had the ITLOS judgment found Ghana in breach of the territorial waters of her western neighbor, Cote d’Ivoire, and the consequences would have been grave.

For instance, if the ITLOS decision had gone against Ghana, the Ghanaian government’s Free Senior High School policy, which took off early this month with an ambitious plan to educate some 400,000 qualified Junior High School leavers for free in its first year of implementation alone, would have suffocated.

This is because the Nana Addo administration has said revenue from oil and gas, as well as earnings from other mineral resources, will go into funding the policy, which is expected to eat up some 400 million Ghana cedis in its first year of implementation.

As Ranking Member on Energy, Mr. Hammond, was a full-time critic of the John Mahama administration, often slamming the government for its management of Ghana’s oil and gas resources.

He was also a religious critic of the Mahama government’s handling of the nation’s most recent power sector crisis that crippled many businesses.

Mr. Hammond tells Citi News in an exclusive interview that in the course of his work as Minority Spokesperson on Energy, he stumbled on “a very disturbing allegation” that made him “panic.”

He said “credible local and international sources” had told him that the government in Accra was negotiating possible settlement of the maritime dispute in a way that could see the government in Abidjan walk home with a significant portion of disputed oil-and-gas-rich territory.

The former Deputy Energy said upon hearing the claims he immediately “sought audience with President Mahama” in order to ascertain the veracity of the allegations.

He stated that in what was his first and last visit to the Flag Staff House during John Mahama’s tenure, he advised the President “strongly” against taking any decision to settle the dispute out of court.

“It was at that meeting that the President told me that he will take steps to have the dispute with Ivory Coast referred to the ITLOS for settlement”, Mr. Hammond said on the phone from London, from where he monitored Saturday’s judgment.

“My mission to the Flagstaff House was clear. Tell the President what I knew about the dispute and to, as Ranking Member, counsel him not to settle for anything that could make us worse-off.”

Under pressure from this reporter to disclose further details of what the President Mahama said to him about the allegations, Mr. Hammond pleaded what he called “Presidential Privilege,” saying it barred him from making additional disclosures.

Mr. Hammond told this reporter that true to the President’s assurances to him at the closed-door-meeting, he was informed days later that Ghana had indeed dragged Ivory Coast before the ITLOS over the maritime dispute.

Asked if he felt vindicated by the outcome of the litigation, the Adansi Asokwa MP said, “I won’t call it vindication. I’ll say I have always known – based on the work we did during President John Kufour’s era – that the oil is ours. I knew, having worked under President Kufuor as a Deputy Minister for Energy, that there was no way Cote d’Ivoire was going to take away what is rightfully ours”.

According to Mr. Hammond the outcome of the ITLOS decision should be a devastating shame to all those NPP people who have used his meeting with President Mahama as evidence that he was in bed with the governing NDC at the time.

As an outspoken Ranking Member, Mr. Hammond was seen by many as a natural future Energy Minister in the event of Nana Addo’s victory at the 2016 polls.

However, eight months after the NPP won the elections, Mr. Hammond remains an ordinary Member of Parliament without any ministerial appointment.

Sources say his exclusion from Nana Addo’s government stems from accusations he was in bed with President Mahama’s government, claims he vehemently denies.

“So all those who think I was mixing up with John Mahama and his people must be ashamed by now. All those people who were moving from one place to the other with all kinds of gossip about must be embarrassed by the decision. They ought to have known that I was working for Ghana”.

He added, “I just could not comprehend that the Ivoirians, considering all we knew about them, the work we were doing, so belatedly, were laying claim to Ghana’s oil.

Former President Mahama was not immediately available to comment on Mr. Hammond’s claims, although he issued a statement on Saturday in which he named a number of prominent people who, he said, played significant roles in the ITLOS victory. Mr. Hammond was not mentioned in the statement.

“I am proud of the results and salute my brother President Alassane Ouatarra that we did not allow this litigation to mar the cordial relations that exists between Ghana and La Cote D’Ivoire.

Ghana owes a debt of gratitude to the following- former Attorney General & Minister for Justice Marietta Brew Appiah-Opong, Deputy Attorney General Dominic Ayine, Solicitor General Helen Ziwu; International Counsels Professor Philippe Sands Q.C. and Paul Reichler; Fui Tsikata and team from Reindorf Chambers; Hanna S. Tetteh, Kofi Buah, Nii Osah Mills, Jane Ahetor and Dr. Joseph Kwadwo Asensuo; Theo Ahwireng and team from Petroleum Commission; Thomas Manu and team from the GNPC; Kojo Efunam and officials of the EPA; Kwame Mfodwo & Professor Martin Tsamenyi from the Maritime Boundary Secretariat; Alex Tait of International Mapping Associates; members of the former Cabinet who endorsed my decision to proceed to ITLOS, and others too many to mention,” John Mahama’s statement said.

The Special Chamber of the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) ruled in favor of Ghana in the three-year-long maritime dispute between the country and Côte d’Ivoire on Saturday.

In a unanimous decision, the Tribunal found that contrary to the claims of the government in Abidjan, Ghana did not violate Côte d’Ivoire’s maritime boundary in anyway.

The Chamber also rejected Côte d’Ivoire’s legal argument that Ghana’s coastal lines were unstable. The panel also found that Ghana’s oil and gas exploration activities in the disputed basin did not violate Côte d’Ivoire’s sovereign rights.